Abstract
Why do investors buy underperforming mutual funds? To address this issue, we develop a one-period principal-agent model with a representative investor and a fund manager in an asymmetric information framework. This model shows that the investor's perception of the fund plays a key role in the fund's fee-setting mechanism. Using a simple relation between fees and funds' performance, empirical evidence suggests that most US domestic equity mutual funds have added high markups during the period from July 2003 to March 2007. For these fees to be justified, we show that the investor would have expected the fund manager to deliver an overall annual net excess-return of around 1.5% above the S&P500 on a risk adjusted basis. In addition, our model offers a new classification of funds, based on their ability to provide benefits to investors' portfolios.