Logo image
Utility-Consistent Valuation Schemes for the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment of Life Insurance Companies
Journal article

Utility-Consistent Valuation Schemes for the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment of Life Insurance Companies

Olivier Le Courtois, Mohamed Majri and Li Shen
Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, Vol.15(1), pp.47-79
01/01/2021

Abstract

expected utility theory cumulative prospect theory ORSA market-consistent Fair value best estimate of liabilities overall solvency needs own funds SAHARA SAHARA-CPT
In this paper, we construct new valuation schemes for the liabilities and economic capital of insurance companies. Specifically, we first build a ‘SAHARA’ valuation framework based on Symmetric Asymptotic Hyperbolic Absolute Risk Aversion utility functions. Then, we construct a ‘SAHARA-CPT’ framework that incorporates the previous utility function as a value function and that is based on Cumulative Prospect Theory. The process used for assessing a life insurance company’s own funds consists in replacing the market-consistent parametrization with a utility-consistent parametrization that accounts for the risk aversion of the market and the long-term duration of the company’s commitments. Our illustrations show that this approach leads to a lower value of the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment and to a lower volatility of own funds. The framework that is based on cumulative prospect theory has the advantage over the expected utility theory framework that it considers a precautionary overweighting of extreme events, as a tradeoff for additional model complexity.
pdf
APJRI_LeCourtois_202101
Restricted Access

Metrics

14 Record Views

Details

Logo image